POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.scene-files : Isosurface Approximation macros rewrite : Re: Isosurface Approximation macros rewrite Server Time: 8 Jan 2009 01:34:45 GMT
  Re: Isosurface Approximation macros rewrite  
From: Jaap Frank
Date: 6 Mar 2008 21:46:38
"Tor Olav Kristensen schreef:
> Jaap Frank wrote:
>> "Tor Olav Kristensen" <tor.olav.k [at] TOBEREMOVEDgmailcom> schreef in 
>> bericht
>> news:47cb52c2$1@news.povray.org...
>>> nemesis wrote:
>
>  .....
>> With these new add-ons it gives splendid results and it is very fast, 
>> even
>> for
>> rough surfaces you get acceptable results.  Maybe you see possibilities 
>> for
>> new streamlining of the code.
>
> It looks promising, but I don't have much spare time these days, so I'll
> have to look at your additions at a later moment. Sorry.

Hello Tor Olav,

No problem. I will check for your reaction. Don't hurry your self.


>> Of coarse nemesis can use it for the Povray Object Collection, if Kevin
>> agrees too, because he started it all.
>
> Just for the record:
>
> Does that also mean that you release your contributions to these macros
> under the CC-GNU LGPL, as described in this page ?
>
>   http://lib.povray.org/usersguide/04contributing.html
>
> (There's a copy of the licensing section below my signature.)

I approve of  this licence. So go ahead.


> If both you and Kevin do, then I'll go on and submit the macros to the
> collection. (I haven't go any response from Kevin yet. I'm not sure
> what his current email address is.)

I've googled the news site, but his last entry was july 1 2003 with
the file I later changed. That email address was kevin < at > ekoik.com,
but I think that you used that one.
I must say that I was wondering that time that he never reacted to the
changes I made. So far I can see he never posted again after that.
So there is a possibility that we can't reach him.
Can we go on without his approval? I've no experience with this. What
do you think?

>> Example statistics (you can see the pictures):
>>
>> Fn        Segs  SubSegs  Depth  Check    TriCnt     Time   Correct?
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Crackle   6         6            2        on       978552   13m 10s     ±

This line should be:
Crackle   6         6            2     *off*      978552   13m 10s     ±


>> You can test my files and see some results with it.
>
> I'll do that.

Will hear from you when you had time for it.

Greetings,

Jaap Frank


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2008 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.