Darren New wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> OK. The Amiga lacked the necessary hardware for that.
> 
> I do find it interesting that you ask what Windows does that the Amiga 
> doesn't, and when given an extensive list, everything is dismissed as 
> either "The Amiga didn't have the hardware for that" or "I don't use 
> that so it doesn't count."

Well, if the hardware doesn't support it, how is the software supposed 
to offer that feature? Let's be realistic here. Given the available 
hardware, the software did almost everything you could expect of it. 
There's only a few things it could have provided but didn't. (Like 
multiple users and security. Or a real network stack.)

>> The STOP messages give generic error codes.
> 
> Fortunately, the Amiga was far superior in this regard. ;-)

Yes. It didn't crash. ;-)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message