|
 |
>> M$ doesn't *own* Novell. They merely agreed in principle to cooperate
>> in their design strategies. That's all. SuSE is still powered by OSS
>> and so on and so forth.
>
> It's crippled with M$ tech and IP, like mono and all tools which more
> and more depend on it. That's what Ballmer meant by Linux using M$ IP.
Er... Mono is an free reimplementation of M$ proprietry technology to
allow people to use it without being tied to M$?
Isn't that like complaining that including a free Java implementation is
"crippling the system with Sun IP"?
>> How do you even pronounce that? [Not that it matters I guess...]
>
> there's an ogg video of Nelson Mandela -- as if you would know who is he
> -- in the Examples directory. He speaks about the ancient Ubuntu
> african concept...
Uh, yes, I think I *might* have slightly heard of Mr Mandela. :-P
> (Ooboontoo, emphasis on middle syllable, t pronounced kinda like in
> "bottle")
OK.
>> Isn't DeCSS illegal?
>
> is it legal to make backup copies of stuff you buy? Is it legal to get
> rid of stupid mechanisms that don't play well with OSes that don't act
> according to the RIAA and others best interests?
>
> You can make up your own mind or just follow their rules...
Fact: The law is the law, regardless of what it "right" or not.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
 |