Thanks indeed Chris, for your outlook.

I always wait till other people have given their comments :-) They are often 
much better in formulating things than I am. So I join and support the 
comments already given here. Warp's comment in particular, I found 
interesting as I had not realized that point consciously. It is very 
important that a future IRTC, or its continuing, should provide for the 
artistic-minded and the technical-minded, in alternance or in parallel 
competitions. We all can learn profoundly from both aspects, and I believe 
they may even strengthen and complement each other.

I am very much in favour also of the proposals you have given, especially 
the use of Challenges, with shorter or longer runtimes and/or complexities. 
But again, let me stress the importance of some survival of the classic IRTC 
philosophy as a continuity link, or a backbone if you wish, of the 
competion(s).

Thomas

Post a reply to this message