|
|
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:43c9627a$1@news.povray.org...
>I second that motion! I was rather frustrated judging this round because I
>couldn't tell if certain entries were by newbies trying hard or more
>experienced people who were hardly trying. This greatly affects how I write
>my comments, though doesn't really affect my scoring.
Exactly! It's not hard to score, (well...), but commenting becomes a
hassle to the point where I've deleted some of my comments. I don't want to
'talk down' to someone with better experience than myself, (and there are
*many* out there), but at the same time, I know I can offer valid comments
to less experienced than me, but I just don't know who they are. Some
indication of experience would help a lot with commenting.
>
> Usually I just deduce it from the description, a detailed description
> usually means a lot of effort went in, a short one usually means the
> entrant is being lazy... but not always. This time I noticed a bunch of
> entries that seem to be related (possibly a class of schoolkids entered,
> as has happened before), and none of them provided much info in the text
> files, but I guess they were all newbies so I tried to leave good
> comments.
At the very least, I think every entrant should *have* to reply to the
"DESCRIPTION OF HOW THIS IMAGE WAS CREATED:" Even if it is short.
>
> Also, I think experience is more relevant than age, there's plenty of old
> noobs :)
True, and with my experience, I'll put myself in that bracket, ;o) but I'm
finding it difficult to comment on this round, to say the least.
~Steve~
>
> --
> Tek
> http://evilsuperbrain.com
>
>
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:43c40420@news.povray.org...
>> Is it possible that the term/s 'AGE:' and/or 'EXPERIENCE:' could be added
>> to the submission text file?
>>
>> My reason for this is that sometimes one can view an image, and you
>> really can't judge it depending on the image submitted - sometimes the
>> image 'feels' like it's from someone fairly experienced, but you really
>> don't know if they meant to try a 'cartoony' or 'serious' image or not,
>> (unless they explain under the 'how this image was created' title), or
>> they may lack experience, but produce quite a 'grown-up' (for want of a
>> better term), image for their age. (In which case, I would also like to
>> praise them).
>>
>> Personally, if there is a 12 year old submitting an image, (is there an
>> age limit?), and putting some effort into a subject, then I would like to
>> know this and help them, (comment), in whatever capacity I can, and judge
>> accordingly.
>>
>> Just a thought.
>>
>> ~Steve~
>>
>>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|