Kenneth <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> Let me clarify my earlier post, with a nod to Mike Raiford's clue.  I can
> see now why there's a bit of confusion. POV's description is correct,
> though "worded" in mathematical terms.

  Perhaps my mind is too spoiled by mathematics, but I really can't
understand how the definition can be confusing, given that you think
about it even for a second.

  After all, it says "if A is negative the result is -A". What does anyone
expect the result to be, reading and understanding this definition?
  I mean, how else could you say that so that it doesn't sound stupid?

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message