St. wrote:
> Does an image *need* a 'meaningful' title so that the viewer understands 
> more readily what is going on?
> 
>  I understand that some images may be obvious, but what if they're not 
> to the viewer?
> 
> I'm having problems at the moment with what to name some of my 
> <hopefully!> minimalism images, (about five of them).
> 
>  ~Steve~
> 

After looking up a lot of the minimalist artists and their works I'm 
beginning to think minimalism means not having anything going on.  Very 
basic nothings seems to be the key.

Maybe a series... nothing #1, nothing #2 etc...

RG

Post a reply to this message