Tim Nikias wrote:
>>I thought the votes were due a while ago by now?  Or were they extended?
>>The main site still shows them accepting when I thought the results would
>>be posted by now.
> 
> 
> It's the usual delay. The IRTC is run "by hand", and someone needs to have
> the spare time to update the site. Just be patient. :-)
> 

Then they shouldn't place statements like, "Winners will be announced on 
26 March 2005." on the website. If there is no intention of running 
things on time, then that is what should be stated.
Hanging around while everything just wallows in a black hole somewhere, 
with zero feedback, really takes all the fun and enjoyment out of the 
competition.

Post a reply to this message