"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message 
news:41e7a1ab@news.povray.org...
> Slime <fak### [at] emailaddress> wrote:
>> +C ? Unless you're using radiosity...
>
>  At least in the past using +C with radiosity was not a problem.
>  If it's a problem currently, it's a bug, imho.
>

I did a +C and it looks ok (even with radiosity), but it happened to crash 
right where there is a natural horizontal line in the image, so any problems 
wouldn't likely be noticed anyway.  It's only a 4-day render, and there are 
a couple things that I'm still not 100% happy with, so it will likely be 
re-rendered regardless.

But...  If I recall correctly, using +C with radiosity was a problem in 3.5. 
Is that what you mean?  If there was a way around it (short of saving the 
radiosity data before doing the render), I was never aware of it.  You 
basically end-up with a line where the continuation took place.  At least, 
that's what I recall.

-- 
Jeremy
www.beantoad.com