|
|
Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:
>
> Thank you Steve, Setep and Christoph for encouraging me
> to do more of these.
>
> This time I followed Christoph's advice to use change
> texture and use radiosity.
>
> But since I'm not familiar with radiosity settings,
> I borrowed some code from a POV-file that Gilles Tran
> posted to povray.text.scene-files back in August:
>
> news://news.povray.org/398EE231.F90E52DC%40inapg.inra.fr
>
> This is my first radiosity image. And my P100 used about
> 70 minutes to render it.
>
I looks good, the bright parts are a bit overexposed. The radiosity
settings seem quite good, i suppose you used the same values Gilles used
in his picture.
> I have seen nice radiosity images posted by Gilles, Xplo
> and Kari, but I'm not able to tell how they differ.
>
> Can anyone please try to explain me what I should look
> for when comparing those images ?
>
The main problem about radiosity pictures are of course artefacts, a
strong normal like in your picture often avoids this to some extend. Have
you had a look at my radiosity tutorial?
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|