"jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:

> having just read your follow-up, it seems that the interpolation "loose end"
> needs to be sorted.  if then you can provide a (working) "worked example" and
> (brief ;-)) explanation, we can update that part of the documentation.

I'll try to get it worked out, unless someone else manages to do it before me.

I just had some success following up on a hunch that the spline is a Catmull-Rom
type.

https://qroph.github.io/2018/07/30/smooth-paths-using-catmull-rom-splines.html

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~fp/courses/graphics/asst5/catmullRom.pdf

https://andrewhungblog.wordpress.com/2017/03/03/catmull-rom-splines-in-plain-english/

-BW

Post a reply to this message