|
 |
On 20/12/2025 23:53, jr wrote:
> hi,
>
> kurtz le pirate <kur### [at] free fr> wrote:
>> ...
>> what do you think of this version?
>> ...
>
> several things. </grin> first, it was fun to compare (thanks) and find the old
> "swings and roundabouts" adage confirmed.
>
> it is pretty neat, the all-in-one macro. pretty compact too. (too small to
> merit an include file </facetious-grin>) not having a "mathematical brain" I
> found your code "amazing" but not as "obvious" as the method/algorithm provided
> by Wikipedia. also, it comes at a cost. when running each macro ~20k times (5
> loops over 1-3999 range) the nested loops are a little more "expensive".
20K is a lot, and double loops can be detrimental. You're right.
In fact, a long time ago, I was developing applications with FileMaker
and I had the same need. I just found my function and converted it to
POV SDL. Juste for fun ;)
--
kurtz le pirate
compagnie de la banquise
Post a reply to this message
|
|
