On 4/15/24 15:31, RATH, CHRISTOPHER A wrote:
> However, when I used a value < 1, I was running into the floating point 
> range problem that was giving very weird results.

Moving to a smaller isosurface accuracy setting(a) might well help too, 
if you've not already tried it.

Bill P.

(a) - As a rough rule, accuracy values of 1e-5 / 1e=6 are about the best 
we can actually achieve with isosurfaces.

Post a reply to this message